Now compare this to Jen, a gelfling from the 1982 Jim Henson film The Dark Crystal.So what do we learn? Most probably A. afarensis is ancestral to the gelflings, as well as later, more well-known hominins like A. africanus, robustus, boisei, and our genus, Homo. I suppose the gelflings were an evolutionary 'side-branch.' And since DIK-1-1 is a juvenile while this gelfling is an adult, we have documented here a case of paedomorphosis, an evolutionary phenomenon in which the adults of the descendant taxon appear more similar to the juveniles of their ancestors (for a real-life example of this, see the axolotl).
Also, Alemseged et al. posit that the gorilla-like morphology of the Dikika scapula may reflect climbing behavior. Well, if we remember The Dark Crystal, we'll recall that Jen climbed Aughra's model solar system with gusto when the bad guys came and messed the place up. So the functional interpretation of the fossil shoulder is corroborated with behavioral data from the animatronic puppet. Oh, also I think the gelflings lived in a wooded, perhaps even forest environment. Such environments likely characterized the habitats of earlier hominins, but isotopic and relative abundances of different kinds of other fossil animals suggest that Dikika may have been a bit more open (Wynn et al. 2006).
Reference
Alemseged Z, Spoor F, Kimbel W, Bobe R, Geraads D, Reed D, and Wynn J. 2006. A juvenile early hominin skeleton from Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature 443: 296-301.
Wynn J, Alemseged Z, Bobe R, Geraads D, Reed D, and Roman D. 2006. Geological and paleontological context of a Pliocene juvenile hominin at Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature 443: 332-336.
3 comments:
This is an outrage! You completely left out the part where Kira (the female gelfling) had wings - did that bit of sexual dimorphism evolve in Dikika or only in the gelfling side branch?
(I love this post)
Good point. From what I could tell, the wings sprouted out of her back, insect-like, without any bones. So this does raise the question about wings in hominin evolution. The only direct evidence we'll get will be trace fossils with the imprint of wings, in clear association with hominin bones. And hopefully such fossil would preserve a canine or pelvis or something so we could try to determine its sex, to test your hypothesis of sexual dimorphism.
Also, does DIK-1-1's ape-like hyoid, and the fact that the gelflings spoke perfect English (and some other language, I think) bear on the evolution of language? Depends on when the gelfling divergence was, I guess.
*Thumbs up* Good comparison there, hehe.
Post a Comment